Where are we with The Palestinian's rights?

Here is, a piece of recent evidence to back your claims that your Palestinian land was at the hands of the imperial forces of yesterday's colonies, and their ridiculous abject enslavement of humanity, through brute force of invading greedy savage Barbarian- pirates, and slavers of dark age exported European BRUTAL TYRANNIES.

Today their shameful score is above 18000 children killed for sport, countless, if not too many Medical Doctors/journalists liquidated in cold blood to keep the world in the dark, while they rape their kidnapped Palestinian men victims. The entire Palestinian population is made homeless, and in rubles, while they are promoting a cardinal crime of ethnic cleansing, on top of it all; in their controlled narrative's biased one-sided hypocritical racist propaganda. In a world oblivious to International courts of justice's verdicts, global accusatory demonstrations, uproar, disbelieve and dismay! By the way, I'm an American citizen/ Haouari-Berber, originally from North Africa, and not an Arab! If you ask me about the pogrom's unfortunate history in occupied Palestine since 1948, I'll tell you it's the Arab's fault for not standing up to the Zionist invaders, as a confrontational political front in unity for their rights! They spend their resources and time in debauches imitating what they can't understand yet! The democratic process takes time, and many ingredients to mature, like a good wine! Good luck to all of us. Love and peace. Haouari Rahal. AKA Richard Azzouz. 2/23/25. The USA.

Etymology First recorded in English in 1882, the Russian word pogróm (погро́м, pronounced [pɐˈɡrom]) is derived from the common prefix po- (по-) and the verb gromít' (громи́ть, [ɡrɐˈmʲitʲ]) meaning 'to destroy, wreak havoc, demolish violently'. The noun pogrom, which has a relatively short history, is used in English and many other languages as a loanword, possibly borrowed from Yiddish (where the word takes the form פאָגראָם).[19] Its modern widespread circulation began with the antisemitic violence in the Russian Empire in 1881–1883.[20]

There is no universally accepted set of characteristics which define the term pogrom.[6][23] Klier writes that "when applied indiscriminately to events in Eastern Europe, the term can be misleading, the more so when it implies that 'pogroms' were regular events in the region and that they always shared common features."[4] Use of the term pogrom to refer to events in 1918–19 in Polish cities (including the Kielce pogrom, the Pinsk massacre and the Lwów pogrom) was specifically avoided in the 1919 Morgenthau Report; the word "excesses" was employed instead because the authors argued that the use of the term "pogrom" required a situation to be antisemitic rather than political in nature, which meant that it was inapplicable to the conditions which exist in a war zone.[6][24][25] Media use of the term pogrom to refer to the 1991 Crown Heights riot caused public controversy.[26][27][28] In 2008, two separate attacks in the West Bank by Israeli Jewish settlers on Palestinian Arabs were characterized as pogroms by then Prime Minister of Israel Ehud Olmert.[15][29] Werner Bergmann suggests that all such incidents have a particularly unifying characteristic: "By the collective attribution of a threat, the pogrom differs from other forms of violence, such as lynchings, which are directed at individual members of a minority group, while the imbalance of power in favor of the rioters distinguishes pogroms from other forms of riots (food riots, race riots or 'communal riots' between evenly matched groups); and again, the low level of organization separates them from vigilantism, terrorism, massacre and genocide".[5]